One of the things I dont like about our current system is you get these anomalies on the fringes and its an imperfect set of rules for classing cars similarly for car competitiveness
- you have a class modifier for weight based on displacement which is fine and dandy for majority of the cars people would race, but it doesn't work at all for the minority, and that leaves a big window for exploits. example: honda s2000's in STU would clean up in that class. you'd have a car that has 240hp from the factory being allowed to weigh <2200 lbs racing against civics. you wouldn't even have to modify the s2000 very much to dominate that class, but you'd be allowed to. Then you have high displacement cars needing crazy amounts of weight added. changing the modifier may make high displacement cars now have realistic weights, but then it means lower displacement cars now get to be retardedly light. No modifier number with the current calculation will ever solve the problem we have now.
- it favours european and japanese cars for IT/ST, and turbo cars for ST. hp/cc is king for our rules, so what do you do? You buy a car with the highest HP/L possible, which really means you should race a honda because they build engines that are 120hp/L, and you avoid anything made on this continent like the plague unless you're going GT1. ST favours turbo cars because while there are limits to NA builds, there is no limit to how much boost you can run or how big of a turbo you put on your engine. Someone someday is going to build a car to the actual limits of what ST allows, and its going to lap the field.
- You get these arbitrary class divide points which leave cars obviously wrongly classed and in a position to annihilate the field. Thus ITCS is born which seems logical, but in reality its still flawed, because you see all kinds of illogical arbitrary decisions being made for car reclassification and thus we have first gen rx7s being reclassed with 100hp from IT3, where they obviously belong, to run against FD rx7s and m3s... and you have 95 240sx's being adjusted to be allowed to weigh 2200lbs in IT2 with a 2.4L engine, but 94 240sx's with the same engine must weigh 2800lbs (who's friend owns a 95 240sx race car is my question).
Our rules are reactionary, not proactive.
So with all that I see potential headaches and pissing people off because we are going to get these issues that arise where the rules allow for glaringly obvious choices for someone to pick a winning race car to build, and someone is going to do it. You're going to have a guy that reads the rules and decides hey, Car X classes amazing for Class Y, and i'm allowed to do XYZ to it to make it even better. I'm going to read the crap out of the rules and build it exactly to the rules and destroy everyone (because almost no one builds their cars to maximize the rules of what's really allowed here). Then racer X shows up with his 99spec FD rx7 in IT1 with 300hp, drops its weight down to 2440lbs with driver which is what the numbers come out to for allowed weight, and does the legal mods he's allowed to do with exhaust, downpipe, and intake, and tuning it, and now you have a car that is 7.x power to weight ratio in IT1 passing current STO cars on the straights.
or maybe racer X wants to show up in STU, and decides to bring a 2L s2000 that's allowed to weigh 2180lbs in STU, and if he's a good driver, is going to coast to first place. Then what happens? I feel with our rules how I see things playing out, he'd be bumped to another class, which imo is a terrible thing to do to someone and is basically saying; thx for actually reading the rules but you built your car too good to them and for that we are punishing you (I know i'd be pretty steamed if i built my car exactly to the limit of what the rules allowed and someone made a judgement call to bump me to a class i'm now out classed in, or that no one races in. it'd be kinda like saying ur $500,000 ALMS GT1 car is too fast so now you have to race with the LMP's). Or the alternative is you have a ton of cars that have no hope of winning unless first breaks down or doesn't show up, which may drive people away from racing.
There is a lot to be said for a classing structure built more closely related to power to weight ratio. However, I wouldn't say i dislike our rules; far from it. I like about 95% of what they are and how they have played out so far, its just that 5% i dont like i see so much potential for it to create a mess down the road and can't see any way to fix that with the current set of rules. I also gotta say, i dont like everything about the NASA Rules either. It still has the same problem with way too many classes for the fields of cars we are seeing, but I do like that it is somewhat easy to jump into another class; i'm just unsure how that would actually play out in real life in our region.